Home freenode/#xmonad: Logs Calendar

Logs: freenode/#xmonad

←Prev  Next→
Page 1 .. 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 .. 397
39,606 events total
2021-05-04 04:39:59 werneta joins (~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
2021-05-04 04:41:53 × werneta quits (~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) (Client Quit)
2021-05-04 04:42:12 werneta joins (~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
2021-05-04 04:43:27 × werneta quits (~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) (Client Quit)
2021-05-04 04:43:44 werneta joins (~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net)
2021-05-04 04:44:13 × werneta quits (~werneta@70-142-214-115.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net) (Client Quit)
2021-05-04 05:41:57 ADG1089 joins (~aditya@122.163.161.198)
2021-05-04 05:47:11 × mohab quits (~mohab@45.243.72.186) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2021-05-04 05:48:03 × growpotkin quits (~growpotki@130-45-30-154.dyn.grandenetworks.net) (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in)
2021-05-04 05:48:34 × ADG1089 quits (~aditya@122.163.161.198) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-05-04 05:53:13 ADG1089 joins (~aditya@122.163.161.198)
2021-05-04 06:06:40 notis joins (~notis@185.51.134.222)
2021-05-04 06:08:21 wonko7 joins (~wonko7@62.115.229.50)
2021-05-04 06:11:05 × ADG1089 quits (~aditya@122.163.161.198) (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
2021-05-04 06:12:38 ADG1089 joins (~aditya@122.163.161.198)
2021-05-04 06:14:02 seschwar joins (~seschwar@unaffiliated/seschwar)
2021-05-04 06:14:11 <ADG1089> meta-q for restarting xmonad isn't working for me, how can i debug that? it's working when i use `xmonad --restart &`
2021-05-04 06:23:16 × srk quits (~sorki@unaffiliated/srk) (Quit: ZNC 1.8.1 - https://znc.in)
2021-05-04 06:24:50 srk joins (~sorki@unaffiliated/srk)
2021-05-04 06:41:34 mohab joins (~mohab@45.243.72.186)
2021-05-04 06:50:14 cfricke joins (~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke)
2021-05-04 06:56:19 × ADG1089 quits (~aditya@122.163.161.198) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-05-04 07:03:54 thc202 joins (~thc202@unaffiliated/thc202)
2021-05-04 07:40:22 × cfricke quits (~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke) (Quit: WeeChat 3.1)
2021-05-04 07:44:14 oogeek joins (~szz_@84.17.34.145)
2021-05-04 07:45:56 <oogeek> So does xmonad treats multiple monitors as a single display? I am reading the source code of X.H.ScreenCorner and it seems that it treats it like that.
2021-05-04 07:49:09 cfricke joins (~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke)
2021-05-04 07:49:18 <oogeek> When multiple monitors are used, I want to restrict the four corners to be monitor aware. By setting the width and height of the SCLowerRight, SCUpperLeft,..., I can do that. However, is it worth to pass a list of tuple (0,0) (1920,0) (4480,0) to the "addScreenCorner function" and rewrite some functions?
2021-05-04 07:50:05 <oogeek> With 1920x1080 + 2560x1440 displays
2021-05-04 08:19:21 kelnoky joins (~shao@ip1f128ba7.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de)
2021-05-04 08:23:46 × mohab quits (~mohab@45.243.72.186) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2021-05-04 08:37:50 mohab joins (~mohab@45.243.72.186)
2021-05-04 09:30:23 × materiyolo quits (~materiyol@112.205.57.255) (Quit: WeeChat 3.0.1)
2021-05-04 10:11:55 × mohab quits (~mohab@45.243.72.186) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2021-05-04 10:24:28 kajzer joins (~kajzer@unaffiliated/kajzer)
2021-05-04 10:25:38 × Natch quits (~Natch@c-e070e255.014-297-73746f25.bbcust.telenor.se) (Remote host closed the connection)
2021-05-04 10:31:02 Natch joins (~Natch@c-e070e255.014-297-73746f25.bbcust.telenor.se)
2021-05-04 10:45:12 mc47 joins (~yecinem@89.246.239.190)
2021-05-04 11:33:15 × ericsagnes quits (~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:4bd1:656f:4270:d212) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-05-04 11:40:35 mohab joins (~mohab@45.243.72.186)
2021-05-04 11:41:31 × notis quits (~notis@185.51.134.222) (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
2021-05-04 11:46:46 ericsagnes joins (~ericsagne@2405:6580:0:5100:a104:d14:93ae:b6b0)
2021-05-04 11:56:11 IanLiu joins (~ian@187.11.111.13)
2021-05-04 11:57:18 <IanLiu> Have you ever experienced delays when opening Gnome applications? I've seen people with the same problem on the web, I've tried all kinds of solutions but none worked for me. Here is my xinitrc: http://ix.io/3lLb/sh . Any help?
2021-05-04 12:02:02 <IanLiu> ^ oops, sorry, wrong channel.
2021-05-04 12:09:07 × IanLiu quits (~ian@187.11.111.13) (Quit: WeeChat 3.1)
2021-05-04 12:41:54 totte joins (~totte@chakra/totte)
2021-05-04 12:50:17 geekosaur joins (930099da@rrcs-147-0-153-218.central.biz.rr.com)
2021-05-04 12:59:05 <Solid> a morning wastes for an idea that was already implemented
2021-05-04 12:59:06 <Solid> sigh
2021-05-04 12:59:09 <Solid> s/tes/ted/
2021-05-04 13:02:05 <mc47> I hope you didn't waste too much time on it :/
2021-05-04 13:02:42 <mc47> The abstraction you added is cool and more versatile though, I wonder if that could be helpful somewhere else
2021-05-04 13:03:39 <mc47> I didn't make a good job making the loggers I added though, so sorry for that
2021-05-04 13:07:02 <oogeek> So does xmonad treats multiple monitors as a single display? I am reading the source code of X.H.ScreenCorner and it seems that it treats it like that.
2021-05-04 13:07:21 <oogeek> When multiple monitors are used, I want to restrict the four corners to be monitor aware. By setting the width and height of the SCLowerRight, SCUpperLeft,..., I can do that. However, is it worth to pass a list of tuple (0,0) (1920,0) (4480,0) to the "addScreenCorner function" and rewrite some functions?
2021-05-04 13:07:23 notis joins (~notis@185.51.134.229)
2021-05-04 13:08:54 <Liskni_si> oogeek: xmonad doesn't, X.H.ScreenCorner does
2021-05-04 13:09:43 <oogeek> So is it worth to add a bit more parameter for X.H.ScreenCorner?
2021-05-04 13:09:56 <oogeek> For multiple monitors
2021-05-04 13:10:25 <Solid> mc47: ah it fine, I needed some break from writing my thesis anyways :)
2021-05-04 13:10:39 <Liskni_si> oogeek: Not really, the module is broken in multiple ways and could use a rewrite :-/
2021-05-04 13:11:30 <oogeek> Liskni_si Broken? Can you elaborate a bit more?
2021-05-04 13:11:32 <Liskni_si> It's basically entirely unaware of multiple screens and the possibility of screen layout changes
2021-05-04 13:11:43 <oogeek> Oh
2021-05-04 13:13:05 <mc47> Solid I feel you, kinda in the same spot
2021-05-04 13:13:33 <mc47> whereas for me it's coding rather than writing, that'll come later
2021-05-04 13:13:53 <oogeek> Solid mc47 So after seeing your discussion on PR #535, I was thinking how I can make a title function be screen aware, I mean, right now on two monitors, each bar show the same title. However, I want the screen with no focus to show nothing. Is that possible, I need some hint as to how to tweak it.
2021-05-04 13:15:15 <mc47> definitely, look at logWhenActive and logCurrentOnScreen
2021-05-04 13:16:13 <oogeek> mc47 Thanks, let me take a look.
2021-05-04 13:16:13 <mc47> https://github.com/TheMC47/dotfiles/blob/master/xmonad/.xmonad/xmonad.hs#L286
2021-05-04 13:16:22 × mohab quits (~mohab@45.243.72.186) (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2021-05-04 13:16:52 <mc47> If you don't want to show anything at all when the screen isn't active, just wrap the logger in logWhenActive
2021-05-04 13:17:08 <mc47> I use it here https://github.com/TheMC47/dotfiles/blob/master/xmonad/.xmonad/xmonad.hs#L301
2021-05-04 13:17:36 mohab joins (~mohab@45.243.72.186)
2021-05-04 13:19:08 <Solid> mc47: no coding for my thesis, so xmonad is a nice change of pace for me =)
2021-05-04 13:19:29 growpotkin joins (~growpotki@130-45-30-154.dyn.grandenetworks.net)
2021-05-04 13:19:59 <oogeek> One reason I start reading the source code of X.H.ScreenCorner is because I just had a algorithm exam this morning.
2021-05-04 13:20:04 <oogeek> Need something to relax
2021-05-04 13:20:32 <Solid> Liskni_si: r.e. what you said about unecessary calls to getName: should I just re-open #535, remove ppTitleUnfocused completely and add something like it to X.U.Loggers (a module I had never consciously acknowledged until today)?
2021-05-04 13:26:51 <oogeek> mc47 Thanks a lot. The log* works really well.
2021-05-04 13:26:58 <mc47> Awesome!
2021-05-04 13:27:08 <Liskni_si> Solid: possibly :-)
2021-05-04 13:29:44 <oogeek> I think that it would be a lot easier to put screen-aware logger functions to ppExtra, and then wrap PP with ScreenId -> PP
2021-05-04 13:33:50 <mc47> not sure I understand what you mean
2021-05-04 13:34:06 <mc47> ppExtras should stay blank, per default. It's up to the users to put what they want there
2021-05-04 13:34:54 <mc47> But having a function that makes a PP screen aware might be a good idea
2021-05-04 13:34:57 <oogeek> Yeah, I mean like the example in your config, if users want to use ppExtra together with log*, it would be easier.
2021-05-04 13:35:30 <oogeek> I don't mean that we should hardwire it to ppExtras, sorry for the misunderstanding.
2021-05-04 13:35:30 <mc47> It would have to be ScreenId -> X PP probably
2021-05-04 13:36:26 <mc47> that's a fun idea to play with :)
2021-05-04 13:37:17 <oogeek> mc47: Also, for my PR on sampleHook for X.A.CopyWindow, do you mean that I should add copiesPP directly to the source code?
2021-05-04 13:39:07 <mc47> Yes, but not as it is. It would take a function as a parameter to be applied when "ws `elem` copies" is true, and otherwise uses ppHidden from the given PP
2021-05-04 13:39:15 <mc47> I think it provides a better UX
2021-05-04 13:40:16 <oogeek> Got it, so I think basically users can pass "String -> String" to it. Is that right?
2021-05-04 13:41:23 <mc47> Rather WorkspaceId -> String, like ppHidden
2021-05-04 13:41:55 <mc47> Which is the same as String -> String, but consistent with the rest of the codebase :)
2021-05-04 13:42:09 <oogeek> Oh OK, let me edit it and push again. :)
2021-05-04 13:42:27 <oogeek> Yeah, right now in the codebase WorkspaceId :: String
2021-05-04 13:44:51 × ml| quits (~ml|@unaffiliated/ml/x-3958674) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
←Prev  Next→
Page 1 .. 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 .. 397

All times are in UTC.