Logs: freenode/#xmonad
| 2021-01-04 02:49:04 | × | abhixec quits (~abhixec@c-67-169-139-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2021-01-04 03:00:52 | × | s00pcan quits (~chris@107.181.165.217) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 03:03:00 | → | s00pcan joins (~chris@075-133-056-178.res.spectrum.com) |
| 2021-01-04 03:29:13 | × | ADG1089_ quits (~adg1089@122.163.234.142) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 03:37:28 | → | abhixec joins (~abhixec@c-67-169-139-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 2021-01-04 03:52:17 | × | abhixec quits (~abhixec@c-67-169-139-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
| 2021-01-04 03:54:46 | × | theDon quits (~td@94.134.91.73) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 03:56:50 | → | theDon joins (~td@94.134.91.22) |
| 2021-01-04 03:57:37 | → | abhixec joins (~abhixec@c-67-169-139-16.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 2021-01-04 03:58:17 | × | xaltsc quits (~xaltsc@unaffiliated/xaltsc) (Ping timeout: 258 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 04:35:53 | → | everythingTaken joins (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) |
| 2021-01-04 05:23:27 | × | elGamal quits (~elg@198.8.85.134) (K-Lined) |
| 2021-01-04 05:41:44 | <abhixec> | Anyone here use xmonad on debian? I am trying to make switch from Arch to Debian but want to know how people get the latest xmonad/xmonad-contrib on debian? |
| 2021-01-04 05:45:02 | <psibi[m]> | I use a debian based distro. I think you can just use stack/cabal to get the latest xmonad/xmonad-contrib and get it working. |
| 2021-01-04 05:50:48 | <abhixec> | thanks psibi[m] |
| 2021-01-04 06:22:25 | → | palo1 joins (~weechat@c-base/crew/palo) |
| 2021-01-04 06:25:16 | × | palo quits (~weechat@c-base/crew/palo) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 06:25:16 | palo1 | is now known as palo |
| 2021-01-04 06:39:43 | × | everythingTaken quits (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 06:41:01 | → | everythingTaken joins (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) |
| 2021-01-04 06:41:42 | × | everythingTaken quits (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) (Client Quit) |
| 2021-01-04 06:47:53 | × | growpotkin quits (~growpotki@130-45-30-154.dyn.grandenetworks.net) (Quit: ZNC 1.8.2 - https://znc.in) |
| 2021-01-04 07:02:39 | → | rekahsoft joins (~rekahsoft@cpe0008a20f982f-cm64777d666260.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 2021-01-04 07:04:07 | × | rekahsoft quits (~rekahsoft@cpe0008a20f982f-cm64777d666260.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2021-01-04 07:04:28 | → | rekahsoft joins (~rekahsoft@cpe0008a20f982f-cm64777d666260.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 2021-01-04 07:17:20 | <Liskni_si> | abhixec: I'm also on debian, been using ghc from deb + stack to build xmonad since forever, these days it's smooth sailing |
| 2021-01-04 07:22:18 | <abhixec> | Liskni_si: that is good to know! |
| 2021-01-04 07:23:05 | <dminuoso> | abhixec: You can also just install ghc/cabal-install with ghcup and do it yourself. It's really not much extra work, and it detaches you from all idionsyncracies of your package management system. |
| 2021-01-04 07:23:08 | <abhixec> | thanks! I am looking to move to debian because I want something stable to I can focus on work rather than having to tinker everytime I update |
| 2021-01-04 07:23:26 | × | et09 quits (~et09@unaffiliated/endolphin) (Ping timeout: 264 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 07:23:41 | <dminuoso> | If I wasn't on NixOS, which gives me the freedom to intermix these two things freely, it's what I'd do. |
| 2021-01-04 07:23:54 | × | rekahsoft quits (~rekahsoft@cpe0008a20f982f-cm64777d666260.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) |
| 2021-01-04 07:24:26 | <abhixec> | dminuoso: is nixos on top of debian or is it separate OS? |
| 2021-01-04 07:24:37 | <abhixec> | I have been very curious about nixos for sometime now! |
| 2021-01-04 07:24:40 | <dminuoso> | It's a separate operating system. |
| 2021-01-04 07:25:09 | <dminuoso> | It's far on the exotic side of distributions, for certain. |
| 2021-01-04 07:25:42 | <srhb> | However, Nix (the package manager) can work on top of Debian -- though the benefits are reduced :) |
| 2021-01-04 07:28:16 | <dminuoso> | abhixec: Part of the reason why I'd probably go with the custom build route, is because it gives me the freedom to just depend on packages/versions with constraints/flags as I want. |
| 2021-01-04 07:32:22 | <abhixec> | I am very intrigued! but currently I just want something that will be stable enough and get me to do my work without me having to tinker too much! I am afraid nixOS is would require a commitement from my end to learn which I would probably do sometime later this year *fingers crossed* |
| 2021-01-04 07:33:42 | <dminuoso> | I wasn't talking about NixOS here. :) |
| 2021-01-04 07:53:22 | <Solid> | Still waiting for that init system abstraction in nixos :> |
| 2021-01-04 08:12:02 | → | thoros joins (~thoros@194-96-55-156.hdsl.highway.telekom.at) |
| 2021-01-04 08:25:56 | → | notis joins (~notis@45.134.22.54) |
| 2021-01-04 08:27:08 | <Solid> | Liskni_si: can I properly rebase another pull request on github? github _really_ wants me to merge changes instead :/ |
| 2021-01-04 08:35:45 | → | cfricke joins (~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke) |
| 2021-01-04 08:38:22 | → | thc202 joins (~thc202@unaffiliated/thc202) |
| 2021-01-04 08:40:32 | <Liskni_si> | Solid: not sure I understand, can you elaborate? |
| 2021-01-04 08:43:53 | <Solid> | I want to rebase this https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/pull/170 on top of current master, but github's "you can edit this pr" tools want me to merge it into master directly |
| 2021-01-04 08:48:12 | <Liskni_si> | oh, I have no idea what can be done using the github UI |
| 2021-01-04 08:49:08 | <Liskni_si> | I vaguely remember that repo admins (which I don't think you are) may in some circumstances push into forks, but this may be limited to enterprise private repos or something |
| 2021-01-04 08:49:55 | <Liskni_si> | when I click the Resolve conflicts button, it tells me "Resolving conflicts between mavant:issue/164 and xmonad:master and committing changes → mavant:issue/164" so maybe if I do that it will push something into the fork? |
| 2021-01-04 08:50:18 | <Liskni_si> | Anyway the best way is to just do it all from the command line and then close the PR manually |
| 2021-01-04 08:50:55 | <Liskni_si> | (although that way the link between the commit and the original PR will be lost) |
| 2021-01-04 08:53:06 | <Solid> | I wish github wouldn't obfuscate stuff like this with their web ui :/ |
| 2021-01-04 08:55:02 | <Liskni_si> | hm, I wanted to test where it will push it by resolving the conflicts, but there's no way I'm going to be able to resolve a several dozen line conflict in that ui |
| 2021-01-04 08:55:16 | <Liskni_si> | that thing is beyond useless |
| 2021-01-04 08:55:24 | → | gazler joins (~gazler@2001:8b0:b165:a8d2::2) |
| 2021-01-04 08:55:25 | <Liskni_si> | I wonder what the target audience is |
| 2021-01-04 08:56:22 | <Solid> | I just checked it (by resolving the conlicts myself and just copying the whole file into that horrible web UI :>) |
| 2021-01-04 08:56:37 | <Solid> | it just merges the changes into the pr |
| 2021-01-04 08:56:46 | <Solid> | which now has two commits, one of them being that merge |
| 2021-01-04 08:56:53 | <Liskni_si> | (but I don't find gitlab's ui better) |
| 2021-01-04 08:57:18 | <Liskni_si> | that probably means github would let you git push --force into the fork directly |
| 2021-01-04 09:18:11 | <Solid> | ah that worked very nicely, thank you! |
| 2021-01-04 09:24:15 | × | gazler quits (~gazler@2001:8b0:b165:a8d2::2) (Remote host closed the connection) |
| 2021-01-04 09:24:33 | → | gazler joins (~gazler@2001:8b0:b165:a8d2::2) |
| 2021-01-04 09:38:52 | → | everythingTaken joins (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) |
| 2021-01-04 09:46:10 | <Liskni_si> | it's a bit unintuitive |
| 2021-01-04 10:06:30 | <Solid> | indeed, getting access to someone else's repo like that feels... weird |
| 2021-01-04 10:23:09 | <everythingTaken> | Hi everyone, any news on borderless single windows on Xinerema? |
| 2021-01-04 10:25:45 | <Liskni_si> | 23:43:58 <Liskni_si> ?tell everythingTaken please try https://github.com/xmonad/xmonad-contrib/pull/440 |
| 2021-01-04 10:26:12 | <Liskni_si> | I wonder why lambdabot didn't tell you as soon as you entered :-/ |
| 2021-01-04 10:26:43 | <everythingTaken> | Liskni_si: it messaged me, I was like wtf who is this lambdabot |
| 2021-01-04 10:27:53 | <everythingTaken> | it says "Liskni_si said something 2days 11 hours ago" |
| 2021-01-04 10:28:12 | <everythingTaken> | why the time wrong? |
| 2021-01-04 10:28:37 | <Liskni_si> | is it wrong? |
| 2021-01-04 10:28:52 | <everythingTaken> | oh you didnt write it now? I got it just now |
| 2021-01-04 10:29:29 | <Liskni_si> | I said it at 23:43:58 CET a few days ago |
| 2021-01-04 10:29:42 | <Liskni_si> | lambdabot told you as soon as you came |
| 2021-01-04 10:36:10 | <everythingTaken> | Liskni_si: thanks! I will try to test it from git repo, but last time I had trouble setting it up from source, many dependency errors etc. It was a nightmare, maybe has to do with ARch. Anyway to do make it work with Xmonad installed with pacman? Manually copy pasting NoBorders.hs etc, Xmonad from pacman is a bin right? |
| 2021-01-04 10:38:12 | <jusa> | hello, I'm trying to achieve following 1) if there is only one "window" with SubLayouts (so multiple windows tabbed) I could do focusUp & Down on that group, 2) if there are multiple windows and even one of them is not tabbed, do regular focusUp.. what I'm struggling with is if there is a way to figure out when we have multiple windows which all are a part of group or not |
| 2021-01-04 10:38:48 | <jusa> | any ideas |
| 2021-01-04 10:38:51 | <jusa> | ? :) |
| 2021-01-04 10:55:10 | × | everythingTaken quits (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) (Quit: everythingTaken) |
| 2021-01-04 10:57:39 | → | everythingTaken joins (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) |
| 2021-01-04 11:02:17 | × | everythingTaken quits (~everythin@gateway/tor-sasl/everythingtaken) (Client Quit) |
| 2021-01-04 11:13:02 | × | cfricke quits (~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke) (Quit: WeeChat 3.0) |
| 2021-01-04 11:22:09 | <Liskni_si> | oh did they leave again? 🤦 |
| 2021-01-04 11:22:48 | <Liskni_si> | ?tell everythingTaken putting NoBorders.hs into ~/.xmonad/lib and renaming to something like XNoBorders and then import XNoBorders might be the easiest way to test it |
| 2021-01-04 11:22:49 | <lambdabot> | Consider it noted. |
| 2021-01-04 11:24:01 | <Liskni_si> | jusa: doesn't the regular focusUp do the same thing as focusUp in a group? |
| 2021-01-04 11:25:08 | <Liskni_si> | (but if you need something considerably more advanced, there is a way, it just isn't very pretty, isn't finished, isn't upstream) |
| 2021-01-04 11:41:23 | → | cfricke joins (~cfricke@unaffiliated/cfricke) |
| 2021-01-04 11:41:48 | <jusa> | Liskni_si: nope, those consider grouped windows as one window |
| 2021-01-04 11:49:02 | → | xaltsc joins (~xaltsc@unaffiliated/xaltsc) |
| 2021-01-04 12:13:13 | → | kelnoky joins (~shao@ip1f1222c4.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) |
| 2021-01-04 12:21:12 | → | AZG256 joins (~user@78-56-98-5.static.zebra.lt) |
| 2021-01-04 12:32:00 | <Liskni_si> | jusa: weird, that's not the behaviour I'm seeing here |
| 2021-01-04 12:34:25 | <Liskni_si> | focusUp/Down from XMonad.StackSet don't know anything about SubLayouts, and the stack of windows is just that, a Stack of Window, so XMonad.StackSet ops just move the focus in the stack and SubLayouts then guesses what was meant by that |
| 2021-01-04 12:40:07 | → | geekosaur joins (ac3a3ed6@172.58.62.214) |
All times are in UTC.